BriefCatch Blog

Writing Tips & Legal Writing Articles

circle_left
circle_right

The Drafter’s Dilemma: “The Greatest of Me, Myself, AND I”? “The Greatest of Me, Myself, OR I”?

By Ross Guberman / December 29, 2020 /

Would you put “and” or “or” in the blank here? How much do you care? And how much would you bet that you’re right? DoorDash’s S-1 statement: “We would cease to be an emerging growth company UPON THE EARLIEST to occur OF: (i) the last day . . . (ii) the date we . .…

Read More

Slasher Fiction? The Federal Circuit Breathes New Life Into the Slash

By Ross Guberman / December 28, 2020 /

To paraphrase Bill Clinton, can an ingredient in a patented drug depend on what the meaning of a slash is? The Problem Bracco Diagnostics patented a formulation for sincalide, a drug used to diagnose disorders of the gall bladder and pancreas. It later sued Maia Pharmaceuticals for infringing the patent. Bracco prevailed at the district…

Read More

If the Judges of Yesteryear Were As Hip As Judges Today . . . .

By Ross Guberman / December 10, 2020 /

Today’s judges pepper their opinions with nods to Marie Kondo, Breaking Bad, Bob Dylan, and Dr. Seuss. Were the old-timers missing a populist touch? You be the judge. I did some pop-culture research to predict how three great opinions might have read differently. Marbury v. Madison (1803) Just as Johnny Appleseed has the last word…

Read More

The Court of Chancery “Edits” a Material Adverse Effect Definition That’s “Obviously Wordy and Full of Synonyms”

By Ross Guberman / December 5, 2020 /

In the holiday spirt, the Vice Chancellor Laster just sent contract drafters a gift: His new blockbuster COVID-related decision “edits” the Material Adverse Effect definition driving the M&A dispute. Here’s the original, the court’s discussion, a redline, and a revised version. Do you agree that the language the Court of Chancery suggests cutting is “obviously…

Read More